The actor creates on the stage infinite sensations, feelings, or emotions that become the emotions of the whole theatrical audience. Before they became the subject of the actor’s embodiment, they were given a literary formulation, they were borne in the air, in social consciousness. I’m not exactly sure how to interpret this last sentence. The thought occurred to me: is it the actor’s responsibility to embody the emotions of a literary character in a way that is directly relatable to the audience? Surely not, right? For instance, I went to high school in a very small and rural town in Pennsylvania, almost all having the same or similar religion, the same political affiliations, what seemed to be the same or similar career paths, etc., and it was a very unpleasant experience for people who did not agree with or wish to embody these ideals (such as myself). If a theatrical performance were to be offered in the town that was too far removed from the town’s culture, yes it would be dif...
Comments
Post a Comment