Learning from teaching vs Impactful experiences from child’s play
I remember very little about my past schooling and I
am not sure if it is because I have this belief that we should spend little
time reminiscing on the past and looking towards the future or is it that my
classroom experiences were all “traditional” and are not stored in my active
memory. The latter would seem applicable as I really do remember more key
events from my “play times” but very few from the formal school settings.
Lev S. Vygotsky states: “In play a child is always
above his average age, above his daily behavior; in play it is as though he
were a head taller than himself. As in the focus of a magnifying glass, play
contains all developmental tendencies in a condensed form; in play it is as
though the child were trying to jump above the level of his normal behavior”
(1967, 16).
The interpretation of the above quote can and has
taken many forms but I do not agree that children learn more from play and
interactions with their peers than in a formal environment. My question from
this would be if all the children are playing and learning from each other then
where did the original knowledge that one shares come from? does it not
originally come from that peer who picked it up for a teacher, a parent or
seeing something along the way. This then brings us back to the argument of the
man on the deserted island, won’t he and the children (without any guidance) struggle
in their groups or seem disorganized not knowing where is up.
I remember in the playing episodes there is always
that child who takes charge and they are normally given this responsibility
because they know more and they can be better leaders but again did they not
learn these experience somewhere. Some clarity is needed with this definition
with regards to the origin of the knowledge to be shared in these groups as it
should not be made to seem as though children in groups will learn from each
other if each other knows no more than the other.
We must also consider how teachers can use play as an
efficient vehicle to deliver academic concepts and skills to preschoolers and
kindergartners if the expectation is that this is the way to get children to
learn then where is the application in the classroom and why is it not more widespread.
Also I need to check on the literature for application
of this theory to an ever higher level that preschoolers and kindergartners as
not only is most of my research on secondary and tertiary teachers but also the
reality that the increase in technology use and the changing definition of the
term play to include that of gadgets and computers may make these theories fully
invalid or in need or adjustments to become applicable in this modern day and
age.
I think maybe we can (artificially) differentiate plays into two types, one of which arise and happen naturally in the context of social relationships and the other of which as a designed activity that we sometimes still call as "play." I think you are referring to the later one when you are saying the usage of play by teachers, but I personally think the overall conversations that we had in class was closer to the previous concept. But I agree with you that teachers can utilize some component in 'play' which can be intrinsic interest, situated interest, social factors, cultural factors, etc. if they intend to incorporate play in teaching.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the response.
DeleteI was hoping to bring across the natural play through my discussion and I was thinking how can teachers use similar concepts (from natural play) in the classroom to achieve a similar goal.