Mathematics, unified sense, and cyberspace

Last week, our discussions about mathematics, sense and meaning have really left me questioning how we can unite the notion of sense in a deliberative, democratic way. While short-term social interactions, like Michael said, leave much to answer, and also render the possible need for deeper social communication pathways to manifest the correct "sense" of things we say depending on our experiences with one another, I wonder if the internet and computer-mediated-communication can sort of unite this sense in some way through deliberative communicative action. I was talking to a friend from the physics department who said that expressing things in logarithmic form under the base 12 rather than 10 expressed formulae in a more eloquent manner. This seems to be universal to physicists who have had the same level of experience with the subject.
Call it generic, but this made me think a little further by associating thought within STEM to computer-mediated technology. While unified sense and eloquent expression within mathematics is something that Vygotsky says language is trying to achieve, I wonder if the void of the internet can help us achieve this unified sense by connecting us with individuals that have similar experiences.
As our post-modern minds get more and more connected to the worldwide web, I wonder if Habermas' hopes for the internet to massify public opinion will manifest in a sort of unification of "sense" associated with language and larger questions that pervade through society for those who choose to engage with cyberspace and create their own niches and corners within it. Our obsession with Reddit as millennials (at least among the people that I associate with) is something that really draws me to this question. When we look at the communications that power such platforms, we can clearly see that those with similar experiences construct knowledge together to come up with balanced solutions to issues that arise from similar experiences.  The resolution of such questions may arise as a result of post within sub-Reddits that deal with specific queries. Isn't this a manifestation of the unified "sense" that Vygotsky says is required to overcome the varied means of elaborate social communication that is needed to simplify our interactions in everyday life?
To expand on this in terms of the example about the C train that Michael enacted with me as a guinea pig, wouldn't one think that communicating on the Internet with those that have similar experiences make such issues, that may be more based on long-term questions more accessible? Wouldn't simpler answers to these questions need shared experience that may be limited by place-based constraints? I'm wondering what you guys think about this.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ZPD vs. Scaffolding

Reading Wood et al.'s (1976) original article in which they introduce the metaphor of "scaffolding" really makes clear how different this is from ZPD.  There is no collaboration (perhaps a better word is co-operation) between the expert and the child... the expert guides the child's actions through controlling their immediate problem-solving experience. The model of scaffolding assumes that the expert is, in a sense, all-knowing in relation to the problem and is not an active participant in the actions of problem-solving.  Vygotsky's theory really seems to require a much more dynamic social interaction or series of social interactions. I also question to what extent a tutor operating in this way can engage with a child's everyday and scientific concepts in a meaningful way. Having read Smagorinsky's (2018) article once more, it is hard not to be convinced of his position. He confirmed with Anna Stetsenko at CUNY (who earned her PhD in Psychology at Mosco...
Read more

Can scientific concepts be taught as everyday concepts? My middle school physics teacher

Image
I began reading the chapter on the development of scientific concepts and it was interesting to see how Vygotsky differentiates between scientific and everyday concepts. Scientific concepts are simply learned or received in completed form (most commonly introduced as a term along with its definition) which in turn leads to understanding, learning, and comprehension. Whereas, everyday concepts do not have a formal definition, need not be universal but still helps us understand the functioning of the society and the world in which we live. When reflecting on all this, I was reminded of a middle school physics teacher I had (Sadly, we had her only for one year), who would not introduce new concepts as 'words' and definitions but instead, would begin class with a demonstration. One of which is depicted below. I so vividly remember her explaining inertia through this method:                                 ...
Read more

Learning from teaching vs Impactful experiences from child’s play

I remember very little about my past schooling and I am not sure if it is because I have this belief that we should spend little time reminiscing on the past and looking towards the future or is it that my classroom experiences were all “traditional” and are not stored in my active memory. The latter would seem applicable as I really do remember more key events from my “play times” but very few from the formal school settings. Lev S. Vygotsky states: “In play a child is always above his average age, above his daily behavior; in play it is as though he were a head taller than himself. As in the focus of a magnifying glass, play contains all developmental tendencies in a condensed form; in play it is as though the child were trying to jump above the level of his normal behavior” (1967, 16). The interpretation of the above quote can and has taken many forms but I do not agree that children learn more from play and interactions with their peers than in a formal environment. My ...
Read more