Emotional connections

To be honest, it's not my first time reading Hamlet, but I don't think I understand Shakespeare's tragedy very well. I feel more related when I read Shakespeare's Sonnets than his play. I guess the reason is that I don't have a closely related experience for the stories at that time and my experience in defining a tragedy is different from what Shakespeare would like to convey. I think only when I situate myself as the hero in the play, will I be able to build the connections. It's by that time would I be the one close to his mind, and feel Hamlet's hesitation of "to be or not to be".

However, I do agree with SaesByul that play can serve the role of emotional development regardless of the difference in everyone's ZPD. Even though I cannot have the spontaneous experience of people at that time as a revenger killing the king, I can somehow portrait myself as the Hamlet in contemporary society. Just like Hamlet, I feel most situations as dilemmas of love and hate and I talk to myself with great inner speech. But most of the time, it ends with wills unfulfilled and I realized how hesitated I was and my lack of ability in operating the world.

One thing stood out in my mind when I was writing this blog. The article mentioned three psychological levels:


"In the fable we discovered two meanings within one and the same action. In the short story we discovered one level for the story (subject) and one for the plot (material). In the tragedy, we uncover yet another level, the psyche and the emotions of the hero. "
Even I found myself less related to Hamlet's story, I still feel the emotion of the hero. I guess this is the beauty of strategy. It forces us to perceive things with the hero's eyes and shape our feelings, regardless of how far we are from the characters, the deaths of kings, and the revenge. We recognize who we are and how we feel, symbolizing our feelings to build the "emotional awareness".



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ZPD vs. Scaffolding

Reading Wood et al.'s (1976) original article in which they introduce the metaphor of "scaffolding" really makes clear how different this is from ZPD.  There is no collaboration (perhaps a better word is co-operation) between the expert and the child... the expert guides the child's actions through controlling their immediate problem-solving experience. The model of scaffolding assumes that the expert is, in a sense, all-knowing in relation to the problem and is not an active participant in the actions of problem-solving.  Vygotsky's theory really seems to require a much more dynamic social interaction or series of social interactions. I also question to what extent a tutor operating in this way can engage with a child's everyday and scientific concepts in a meaningful way. Having read Smagorinsky's (2018) article once more, it is hard not to be convinced of his position. He confirmed with Anna Stetsenko at CUNY (who earned her PhD in Psychology at Mosco...
Read more

Can scientific concepts be taught as everyday concepts? My middle school physics teacher

Image
I began reading the chapter on the development of scientific concepts and it was interesting to see how Vygotsky differentiates between scientific and everyday concepts. Scientific concepts are simply learned or received in completed form (most commonly introduced as a term along with its definition) which in turn leads to understanding, learning, and comprehension. Whereas, everyday concepts do not have a formal definition, need not be universal but still helps us understand the functioning of the society and the world in which we live. When reflecting on all this, I was reminded of a middle school physics teacher I had (Sadly, we had her only for one year), who would not introduce new concepts as 'words' and definitions but instead, would begin class with a demonstration. One of which is depicted below. I so vividly remember her explaining inertia through this method:                                 ...
Read more

Learning from teaching vs Impactful experiences from child’s play

I remember very little about my past schooling and I am not sure if it is because I have this belief that we should spend little time reminiscing on the past and looking towards the future or is it that my classroom experiences were all “traditional” and are not stored in my active memory. The latter would seem applicable as I really do remember more key events from my “play times” but very few from the formal school settings. Lev S. Vygotsky states: “In play a child is always above his average age, above his daily behavior; in play it is as though he were a head taller than himself. As in the focus of a magnifying glass, play contains all developmental tendencies in a condensed form; in play it is as though the child were trying to jump above the level of his normal behavior” (1967, 16). The interpretation of the above quote can and has taken many forms but I do not agree that children learn more from play and interactions with their peers than in a formal environment. My ...
Read more